** Ethereum: Why is the signing of signature different for each entry into a multi-entry transaction?
In Ethereum, when a multi-entry transaction is executed, the signing of the transaction differs from the input hatch. This may seem counter-intuitive at first, but it is essential to understand why this design choice was made.
BIP 14: Signature subsidy
The interface of Ethereum block producer (BPI) allows several inputs in a multi-entry transaction. To adapt to these cases, the BIP 14 defines substances, which are intermediate hatching to be executed effectively.
When creating a sub-settlement, the Ethereum virtual machine (EVM) replaces the previous scriptpubkey for each entry, which leads to different signature atmosphere. This substitution is necessary because the transaction exit addresses correspond to those expected.
** Why different signatures?
The various signatures are not arbitrary; They serve a specific objective:
1 and 1
- Efficiency
:
.
In conclusion
. Optimize transactions treatment and ensure safety. Inputs correctly, allowing us to perform transactions effectively and safely.
Example of use cases
Consider a multi-entry transaction in which two users wish to send funds from one account to another using different scriptpubkeys. Scriptpubkeys – would assure that:
- The output addresses correspond to expectations.
- The treatment of transactions is effective.
- Security is maintained.
Transactions are the result of the EVM capacity to replace, safety and security.
